$T_n(x)$T sub n of x — nth-degree Taylor polynomial
The finite partial sum of a Taylor series (Chapter 10) through the xn term: Tn(x)=k=0∑nk!f(k)(a)(x−a)k. An ordinary polynomial, unlike the full infinite Taylor series.
$R_n(x)$R sub n of x — remainder
The error: Rn(x)=f(x)−Tn(x), the gap between the true function value and the n-th degree Taylor polynomial's approximation of it.
$c$c — the unnamed point in the Lagrange remainder
A specific (but generally unknown) number strictly between a and x, guaranteed to exist by the Lagrange remainder formula in Section 01. Its exact value is rarely known — only its existence and the resulting bound matter in practice.
$M$M — a bound on the (n+1)th derivative
Any number satisfying ∣f(n+1)(t)∣≤M for every t between a and x. Used to convert the Lagrange remainder formula (which involves the unknown c) into a concrete numerical bound on the error.
01 · Taylor's Theorem and the Lagrange Remainder
Chapter 10 built the infinite Taylor series of a function. In practice, only a finite number of terms are ever actually computed — so the natural question is: how far off is that finite approximation?
Definition — Taylor's Theorem with Lagrange Remainder
If f has n+1 derivatives on an interval containing a and x, then
for some (generally unknown) number c strictly between a and x.
Reading the remainder formula
Rn(x) has exactly the same shape as the next term that would appear in the Taylor series (n+1 derivatives, divided by (n+1)!, times (x−a)n+1) — the only difference is that the derivative is evaluated at the mystery point c instead of at a itself. The proof of why such a c must exist is a calculus result in its own right and is not derived here; the formula is used as a given tool for bounding error.
02 · Bounding the Error
Since c is unknown, Rn(x) itself cannot usually be computed exactly. But if a bound M on ∣f(n+1)∣ can be found over the relevant interval, the remainder can be bounded without ever knowing c.
Definition — Taylor Error Bound
If ∣f(n+1)(t)∣≤M for every t between a and x, then
∣Rn(x)∣≤(n+1)!M∣x−a∣n+1
Step-by-step — Bound the error of $T_3(x)$ approximating $e^x$ at $x=0.5$
1
Recall the Maclaurin series of ex (Chapter 10, Section 03):T3(x)=1+x+2x2+6x3 (degree-3 partial sum, a=0).
2
Identify n and the derivative needed:n=3, so the remainder involves f(4)(c)=ec (Chapter 02, Section 10: every derivative of ex is ex).
3
Bound ec over the relevant interval:c lies between a=0 and x=0.5, so 0<c<0.5. Since et is increasing (Chapter 02, Section 10's derivative ex>0 everywhere means ex is always increasing, Chapter 04, Section 01), the largest value of ec on this interval is bounded by e0.5<e1<3 (using e≈2.718<3). Take M=3.
4
Apply the error bound formula:∣R3(0.5)∣≤(n+1)!M∣x−a∣n+1=4!3(0.5)4=243×0.0625.
5
Compute the numeric bound:243=0.125; 0.125×0.0625=0.0078125. So the degree-3 Taylor polynomial approximates e0.5 with error at most about 0.0078 — without ever computing e0.5 exactly first.
6
Verify against the known value:T3(0.5)=1+0.5+0.125+0.02083=1.64583; the true value e0.5≈1.64872. Actual error ≈0.00289, comfortably within the bound of 0.0078 from step 5 — the bound is a guarantee, not a tight estimate.
❌ Using a bound M that only holds at one point, not the whole interval
On the same problem, a common mistake: setting M=f(4)(0)=e0=1 — evaluating the bounding derivative only at the center a=0 instead of over the whole interval from a to x.
Why it breaks: the error bound formula requires M to bound ∣f(n+1)(t)∣ for everyt between a and x, not just at the endpoint a. Here et is increasing, so its largest value on [0,0.5] occurs at t=0.5, not t=0 — using M=1 understates the true maximum of ec on the interval.
Consequence: the resulting "bound" 241(0.5)4≈0.0026 is smaller than the actual error computed in step 6 above (≈0.00289) — an invalid bound that the true error already exceeds. M must be a valid upper bound over the entire interval between a and x, which in this case meant using the right endpoint, not the center.
03 · Common Maclaurin Series, Radius of Convergence, and Approximation
The first three are built from Chapter 02's derivatives of ex, sinx, cosx (Sections 09–10) following Chapter 10, Section 03's construction; ln(1+x) was built in Chapter 10, Exercise 10.3; 1−x1 is Chapter 10, Section 01's geometric series.
Step-by-step — Apply the ratio test (Chapter 10, Section 02) to confirm $e^x$'s series converges for every real x
1
Set up the ratio test on the terms an=n!xn:anan+1=(n+1)!xn+1⋅xnn!=n+1∣x∣ (using n!(n+1)!=n+1).
2
Take the limit as n→∞ for any fixed x:n+1∣x∣→0, since the numerator is a fixed constant and the denominator grows without bound.
3
Conclude:ρ=0<1 for every real x, so by the ratio test the series converges for all x — radius of convergence R=∞. This holds for sinx and cosx's series too, by the identical argument (their coefficients also carry a factorial in the denominator).
❌ Assuming ln(1+x)'s series converges everywhere, like e^x's does
A tempting generalization from Section 03's step-block: assuming every Maclaurin series converges for all real x, since ex's did.
Why it breaks: applying the ratio test to ln(1+x)=∑n(−1)n+1xn: anan+1=n+1xn+1⋅xnn=∣x∣⋅n+1n→∣x∣ as n→∞ (no factorial in the denominator to force the ratio to 0, unlike ex's series). The ratio test then requires ∣x∣<1 for convergence — a finite radius of convergence R=1, not all of R.
Consequence: the series for ln(1+x) is only valid for −1<x<1 (with the right endpoint x=1 separately checkable); plugging in, say, x=5 into the series gives a divergent sum of numbers with no relationship to the actual value ln6. Each Taylor series carries its own radius of convergence — it must be checked individually, never assumed from a different function's series.
04 · Exercises
EXERCISE 11.1
Identify n, find the (n+1)-th derivative, bound it over the interval from a to x, then apply the error bound formula.
Approximating cos(0.3) with T2(x)=1−2x2 (n=2, a=0): the third derivative of cosx is sinx (Chapter 02, Section 09: cosx→−sinx→−cosx→sinx), and ∣sint∣≤1 for all t, so M=1. Bound: ∣R2(0.3)∣≤3!1(0.3)3=60.027=0.0045.
Bound the error when T2(x)=1−2x2 is used to approximate cos(0.3).
EXERCISE 11.2
Compute T2 directly from the coefficients, then compare to the true value using a calculator-level approximation of cos(0.3).
T2(0.3)=1−2(0.3)2=1−20.09=1−0.045=0.955. True value cos(0.3)≈0.95534. Actual error ≈0.00034, well within the bound of 0.0045 from Exercise 11.1.
Compute T2(0.3) from Exercise 11.1 and compare to the true value of cos(0.3)≈0.95534.
EXERCISE 11.3
Apply the ratio test to the general term of the series, exactly as done for ex's series in Section 03.
sinx=∑(2n+1)!(−1)nx2n+1: ratio of consecutive terms' absolute values involves (2n+3)!∣x∣2n+3⋅∣x∣2n+1(2n+1)!=(2n+3)(2n+2)∣x∣2→0 as n→∞ for any fixed x (fixed numerator, denominator grows without bound). So ρ=0<1 always — converges for every real x, R=∞.
Show that the Maclaurin series for sinx converges for every real number x, using the ratio test.
EXERCISE 11.4
Recall which of the series in Section 03 was shown to have a finite radius of convergence, and by how much its ratio-test limit failed to vanish.
ln(1+x)'s series (Section 03's FailBlock) has radius of convergence R=1, unlike ex, sinx, and cosx's series, which all converge for every real x (R=∞). The difference traces back to the denominator of the coefficients: the factorial n! in ex, sinx, cosx's coefficients forces the ratio-test limit to 0 regardless of x, while ln(1+x)'s coefficients have only a plain n in the denominator, leaving a nonzero ∣x∣ in the ratio-test limit.
Which Maclaurin series from Section 03 has a finite radius of convergence rather than R=∞, and what feature of its coefficients causes the difference?
EXERCISE 11.5
Determine how many terms are needed by requiring the error bound formula to be less than the target precision, solving for the smallest valid n.
Approximate e0.2 to within 0.0001 using Tn centered at a=0. Bound: ∣Rn(0.2)∣≤(n+1)!M(0.2)n+1 with M bounding ec for 0<c<0.2; since e0.2<e<3, take M=3. Try n=2: 3!3(0.2)3=63(0.008)=0.004 — too large. Try n=3: 4!3(0.2)4=243(0.0016)=0.0002 — still too large. Try n=4: 5!3(0.2)5=1203(0.00032)=0.000008 — within 0.0001. So n=4 terms (through T4) suffice.
How many terms of the Maclaurin series for ex are needed to approximate e0.2 to within 0.0001? Use the error bound formula to determine the smallest sufficient n.
05 · Chapter Summary
Concept
Formula / Rule
Taylor polynomial
Tn(x)=∑k=0nk!f(k)(a)(x−a)k
Remainder
Rn(x)=f(x)−Tn(x)
Lagrange remainder
Rn(x)=(n+1)!f(n+1)(c)(x−a)n+1, c between a,x
Error bound
∣Rn(x)∣≤(n+1)!M∣x−a∣n+1 where ∣f(n+1)∣≤M on [a,x]
ex, sinx, cosx series
Converge for all real x (R=∞)
ln(1+x) series
Converges only for −1<x<1 (R=1)
Next: Chapter 12 — Convergence Tests, which builds out the full toolkit for deciding whether a series converges, beyond the ratio test introduced here.