Group Actions
00 · Symbol Glossary
Notation for the result of letting group element move a point in some set . Distinct from the group's own operation — here and live in different sets.
— every point reachable from by acting with some group element. The set of everywhere can be "moved to."
— every group element that leaves fixed in place.
— the stabilizer of specifically under the conjugation action. Everything commuting with .
— the orbit of under conjugation. All elements "structurally equivalent" to by relabeling via some .
01 · What Is a Group Action?
Every example of a group so far has, at heart, been a group of motions: permutations moving points, matrices moving vectors, symmetries moving a polygon's vertices. A group action makes this idea of " moves the points of some set " completely precise — and, crucially, need not have any group structure of its own.
A group acts on a set if there is a function , written , satisfying:
A1. for every .
A2. for every , .
This is the key generalization beyond homomorphisms: can be a completely bare set — the vertices of a polygon, the elements of itself, the set of subgroups of — with no operation of its own. All the algebraic structure lives entirely in ; merely receives the motion.
02 · Actions Are Permutations, and Some Standard Examples
For fixed , the map , , is a bijection, with inverse .
Compute (using A2, then A1), and similarly . So is a two-sided inverse for , meaning is a bijection.
, action (the group's own operation). A1: . A2: , using associativity. Every group acts on itself this way — the very first example, and the source of Cayley's theorem (every group embeds into some , since left multiplication realizes as bijections of itself).
(vertex labels), and each symmetry sends vertex to wherever that symmetry moves it. A1 (identity motion fixes every vertex) and A2 (composing two symmetries then applying to a vertex matches applying one after the other) both hold by the geometric meaning of composition. This is the action underlying every cycle-notation computation with from Chapter 02.
, action . A1: . A2: , using (Theorem 2.3). This action will drive the rest of the chapter.
03 · Orbits and Stabilizers
For : , and .
The orbits of a group action partition : every element of lies in exactly one orbit.
Define for some . Reflexive: (A1). Symmetric: if , then (A2, A1), so . Transitive: if and , then (A2), so . By Theorem 1.3, 's equivalence classes partition — and exactly.
for every .
Nonempty: (A1), so . Closure: if , then (A2, then fixes , then fixes ), so . Inverses: if , apply to both sides: , and the left side simplifies to (A2, A1), so , meaning . By Theorem 3.1, .
Fix vertex . : every symmetry sends vertex somewhere, and since the square is vertex-transitive (any vertex can be rotated/reflected to any other), , all four vertices. : the symmetries fixing vertex in place — the identity and the single reflection through vertex and the center. .
Notice — not a coincidence, as the next theorem shows.
04 · The Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem
For any group action of a finite group on and any :
Write . Define by .
Well-defined: if , then by Theorem 4.1, , so (definition of ). Applying to both sides: , and the left side is by A2. So : the map doesn't depend on the representative.
Injective: if , i.e. , apply : , so , giving by Theorem 4.1.
Surjective: every element of has the form for some , which is .
is a bijection between (as a set of cosets — not requiring normal here, since we only need a bijection of sets, not a group isomorphism) and . So , and by Lagrange's Theorem, .
Unlike Chapter 05's quotient groups, here is only a bijection of sets, not a group isomorphism — generally has no group structure at all (it's just a subset of , and was never assumed to be a group). is used here purely as a counting device, valid whether or not happens to be normal. If is not normal, you cannot treat as a quotient group — only the orbit–stabilizer bijection for counting is valid.
05 · Conjugation and the Class Equation
Applying the general machinery of Sections 03–04 to the specific conjugation action from Section 02 gives one of the most powerful counting tools in finite group theory.
Under the conjugation action, is the conjugacy class of , and is the centralizer of .
If , then for every (that's exactly what commuting with everything means), so — a conjugacy class of size 1. Conversely, if , then for every , meaning . Conjugacy classes of size 1 are exactly the elements of .
For a finite group with conjugacy classes (writing out the size-1 classes from separately) and noncentral class representatives :
By Theorem 8.2, conjugacy classes partition , so is the sum of all class sizes. By Theorem 8.4 (Orbit-Stabilizer applied to conjugation), each class has size . Separating the size-1 classes (exactly the elements of , by the Example above) from the rest gives .
06 · Application: Cauchy's Theorem
Lagrange's Theorem (Chapter 04) is one-directional: subgroup orders divide , but not every divisor is achieved (recall , order 12, with no subgroup of order 6). Remarkably, for divisors that are prime, the converse always holds — and the class equation is exactly the tool needed to prove it.
If is a finite group and is a prime dividing , then has an element of order .
By strong induction on .
Case 1: is abelian. Pick any in , and let . If divides , then has order exactly (a direct check: raising it to the -th power gives , and no smaller positive power works, by minimality of among divisors), and we're done.
Otherwise . Since is abelian, (Chapter 05), so is a group of order (strictly smaller, since ). Since and divides but not , must divide (a prime dividing a product but not one factor divides the other). By the induction hypothesis, has an element of order . Let in . Then , so divides (order of an element divides any exponent returning it to the identity — the same fact used in Theorem 7.2's proof). Then has order in .
Case 2: is nonabelian. If divides , then since is abelian and smaller than or equal to (with since is nonabelian, but we can still apply Case 1 directly to the abelian group regardless of its size), has an element of order by Case 1 — and that element also lives in .
Otherwise . By the class equation (Theorem 8.5), . If divided every term in the sum, it would divide the whole sum ; combined with , this would force too — contradicting our assumption. So some noncentral class representative has . Since and divides but not the index factor, must divide . Since is noncentral, , so — a strictly smaller group. By the induction hypothesis, has an element of order , which is also an element of .
Cauchy's Theorem says: for a prime divisor of , an element (equivalently, by Theorem 3.4, a cyclic subgroup) of order is guaranteed. Chapter 09's Sylow theorems extend this from single primes to full prime powers — guaranteeing subgroups of order whenever divides — using the exact same class-equation machinery built here, one level more refined.
07 · Exercises
Check both action axioms directly: does the identity permutation fix everything, and does composing two permutations first vs. applying them in sequence give the same result?
, action . A1: the identity permutation satisfies for every , so . A2: , matching the composition convention from Chapter 02. Both axioms hold: acts on by direct evaluation.
Verify that acts on via , by checking both action axioms.
Use the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem: you're given and ; solve for .
By Theorem 8.4, , so , giving .
A group of order 12 acts on a set, and some point has an orbit of size 4. What is ?
Use the fact from Section 05: conjugacy classes of size 1 correspond exactly to central elements.
By the Example in Section 05, (a size-1 conjugacy class) if and only if . If is abelian, (Chapter 05, Exercise 5.4), so every element's conjugacy class has size 1 — conjugation does nothing at all, consistent with for all when is abelian.
If is abelian, what can you say about the size of every conjugacy class? Justify using the Section 05 fact about .
. Apply Cauchy's Theorem for each prime dividing 12.
, so the prime divisors are and . By Theorem 8.6, must have an element of order and an element of order — but Cauchy's Theorem says nothing about elements of order (since is not itself prime, even though it divides ). This is consistent with 's well-known structure: it has elements of order but none of order or , showing Cauchy's Theorem is genuinely restricted to prime orders, not all divisors.
. Using Cauchy's Theorem, what element orders are guaranteed to exist in ? What does the theorem not guarantee?
08 · Chapter Summary
| Concept | Statement |
|---|---|
| Group action | with and |
| Actions are bijections | Each acts as a bijection of (Thm 8.1) |
| Orbit | ; orbits partition (Thm 8.2) |
| Stabilizer | ; always a subgroup (Thm 8.3) |
| Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem | (Thm 8.4) |
| Conjugation action | ; orbits = conjugacy classes; stabilizer = centralizer |
| Class equation | (Thm 8.5) |
| Cauchy's Theorem | prime, has an element of order (Thm 8.6) |
Next: Chapter 09 — Sylow Theorems sharpens Cauchy's Theorem from single primes to full prime-power divisors, using the same orbit-counting and class-equation techniques developed here to describe the subgroup structure of any finite group almost completely.