Chapter 09
Rigorous

Sylow Theorems

00 · Symbol Glossary

$p$-groupA group of prime-power order

A group whose order is pnp^n for some prime pp and integer n≥0n\geq0. Not to be confused with "a subgroup involving pp" — it specifically means the entire order is a power of a single prime.

$\lvert G\rvert = p^n m$Standard factorization for Sylow theory

Writing a finite group's order with the highest power of a fixed prime pp factored out, where gcd⁡(p,m)=1\gcd(p,m)=1. pnp^n is the largest power of pp dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert.

$\mathrm{Syl}_p(G)$Set of Sylow p-subgroups

The collection of all subgroups of GG having order exactly pnp^n (the maximal pp-power dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert). Each individual such subgroup is called a Sylow pp-subgroup.

$n_p$Number of Sylow p-subgroups

np=∣Sylp(G)∣n_p = \lvert\mathrm{Syl}_p(G)\rvert. The central object counted by Sylow's Third Theorem — its exact value is heavily constrained by two simple arithmetic conditions.

$N_G(H)$Normalizer of H in G

NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H}N_G(H) = \{g\in G : gHg^{-1}=H\} — every element that conjugates HH back onto itself (as a set, not necessarily pointwise). Always contains HH itself, and is the largest subgroup of GG in which HH sits normally.


01 · p-Groups Have Nontrivial Centers

Sylow theory begins by understanding groups whose order is a pure prime power — the building blocks the rest of the chapter assembles inside an arbitrary finite group.

Theorem 9.1 — Nontrivial p-Groups Have Nontrivial Center

If PP is a group with ∣P∣=pn\lvert P\rvert = p^n for a prime pp and n≥1n\geq1, then Z(P)≠{e}Z(P) \neq \{e\}.

Proof

By the class equation (Theorem 8.5): ∣P∣=∣Z(P)∣+∑i[P:CP(xi)]\lvert P\rvert = \lvert Z(P)\rvert + \sum_i [P:C_P(x_i)], summing over noncentral conjugacy class representatives xix_i. Each xix_i is noncentral, so CP(xi)≠PC_P(x_i) \neq P, meaning [P:CP(xi)]>1[P:C_P(x_i)] > 1. Since [P:CP(xi)][P:C_P(x_i)] divides ∣P∣=pn\lvert P\rvert=p^n (Lagrange) and is a divisor of a prime power greater than 1, it must itself be divisible by pp. So every term in the sum ∑i[P:CP(xi)]\sum_i[P:C_P(x_i)] is divisible by pp, hence the whole sum is divisible by pp. Since pp also divides ∣P∣=pn\lvert P\rvert = p^n (as n≥1n\geq1), rearranging the class equation gives ∣Z(P)∣=∣P∣−∑i[P:CP(xi)]\lvert Z(P)\rvert = \lvert P\rvert - \sum_i[P:C_P(x_i)], a difference of two multiples of pp — so pp divides ∣Z(P)∣\lvert Z(P)\rvert. Since e∈Z(P)e\in Z(P) always, ∣Z(P)∣≥1\lvert Z(P)\rvert\geq1; combined with p∣∣Z(P)∣p\mid\lvert Z(P)\rvert, we get ∣Z(P)∣≥p>1\lvert Z(P)\rvert \geq p > 1.

Lemma — G/Z(G) Cyclic Implies G Abelian

For any group GG, if G/Z(G)G/Z(G) is cyclic, then GG is abelian (so in fact G/Z(G)={e}G/Z(G) = \{e\}).

Proof

Suppose G/Z(G)=⟨gZ(G)⟩G/Z(G) = \langle gZ(G)\rangle for some g∈Gg\in G. Take any a,b∈Ga,b\in G; each coset aZ(G)aZ(G) and bZ(G)bZ(G) is some power of gZ(G)gZ(G), so a=giz1a=g^iz_1 and b=gjz2b=g^jz_2 for integers i,ji,j and z1,z2∈Z(G)z_1,z_2\in Z(G). Then:

ab=giz1gjz2=gigjz1z2=gi+jz1z2ab = g^iz_1g^jz_2 = g^ig^jz_1z_2 = g^{i+j}z_1z_2

using that z1∈Z(G)z_1\in Z(G) commutes past gjg^j, and similarly:

ba=gjz2giz1=gi+jz2z1=gi+jz1z2ba = g^jz_2g^iz_1 = g^{i+j}z_2z_1 = g^{i+j}z_1z_2

using that z1,z2∈Z(G)z_1,z_2\in Z(G) also commute with each other. So ab=baab=ba for arbitrary a,b∈Ga,b\in G: GG is abelian. (And if GG is abelian, Z(G)=GZ(G)=G by Chapter 05's Exercise 5.4, forcing G/Z(G)={e}G/Z(G)=\{e\}.)

Corollary 9.2 — Every Group of Order $p^2$ Is Abelian

If ∣G∣=p2\lvert G\rvert = p^2 for a prime pp, then GG is abelian.

Proof

By Theorem 9.1, Z(G)≠{e}Z(G) \neq \{e\}, so by Lagrange's Theorem, ∣Z(G)∣∈{p,p2}\lvert Z(G)\rvert \in \{p, p^2\} (a nontrivial divisor of p2p^2). If ∣Z(G)∣=p2\lvert Z(G)\rvert = p^2, then Z(G)=GZ(G)=G, and GG is abelian, done. If ∣Z(G)∣=p\lvert Z(G)\rvert=p, then ∣G/Z(G)∣=p2/p=p\lvert G/Z(G)\rvert = p^2/p=p, which is cyclic by Corollary 4.6; by the Lemma above, GG is abelian, forcing Z(G)=GZ(G)=G — contradicting ∣Z(G)∣=p<p2\lvert Z(G)\rvert=p<p^2. So this second case cannot occur, and ∣Z(G)∣=p2\lvert Z(G)\rvert=p^2 is the only possibility: GG is abelian.

Example — There are exactly two groups of order 4, up to isomorphism

Corollary 9.2 (with p=2p=2) forces every group of order 4 to be abelian. Now split into cases. If some element has order 4, it generates the whole group: G≅Z4G\cong\mathbb{Z}_4. Otherwise every nonidentity element has order 2 (orders divide 4 by Corollary 4.5, and order 4 is excluded), so pick two distinct nonidentity elements a,ba,b: then ⟨a⟩∩⟨b⟩={e}\langle a\rangle\cap\langle b\rangle=\{e\} (both have order 2 and are distinct), both are normal since GG is abelian, and ∣⟨a⟩⟨b⟩∣=2⋅2=4=∣G∣\lvert\langle a\rangle\langle b\rangle\rvert = 2\cdot2=4=\lvert G\rvert, so Theorem 7.4's internal direct product criterion gives G≅Z2×Z2G\cong\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2.

Exactly two groups of order 4, up to isomorphism — and they are genuinely different, since Z4\mathbb{Z}_4 has an element of order 4 and Z2×Z2\mathbb{Z}_2\times\mathbb{Z}_2 does not (Theorem 7.3). This confirms, with genuine theorems rather than case-checking by hand, the classification hinted at throughout Chapters 05 and 07.


02 · Sylow's First Theorem: Existence

Definition — Sylow p-Subgroup

Let ∣G∣=pnm\lvert G\rvert = p^nm with pp prime and gcd⁡(p,m)=1\gcd(p,m)=1. A subgroup P≤GP\le G with ∣P∣=pn\lvert P\rvert = p^n is called a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG.

Theorem 9.3 — Sylow's First Theorem (Existence)

For any finite group GG and any prime pp dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert, GG has a Sylow pp-subgroup — that is, a subgroup of order pnp^n, the full power of pp dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert.

Proof

By strong induction on ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert. Write ∣G∣=pnm\lvert G\rvert=p^nm, gcd⁡(p,m)=1\gcd(p,m)=1. If n=0n=0, the trivial subgroup {e}\{e\} works.

Case 1: pp divides ∣Z(G)∣\lvert Z(G)\rvert. By Cauchy's Theorem (Theorem 8.6), Z(G)Z(G) has an element zz of order pp. Let N=⟨z⟩N=\langle z\rangle; since N⊆Z(G)N\subseteq Z(G), every g∈Gg\in G satisfies gNg−1=NgNg^{-1}=N (elements of NN commute with everything, so conjugation fixes them individually), so N⊴GN\trianglelefteq G. Then ∣G/N∣=∣G∣/p=pn−1m\lvert G/N\rvert = \lvert G\rvert/p = p^{n-1}m, strictly smaller than ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert. By the induction hypothesis, G/NG/N has a subgroup Qˉ\bar Q of order pn−1p^{n-1}. Let QQ be the preimage of Qˉ\bar Q under the quotient map π:G→G/N\pi:G\to G/N (a subgroup of GG, since preimages of subgroups under homomorphisms are subgroups — the same style of check as Theorem 6.2's proof). Since N=ker⁡π⊆QN=\ker\pi \subseteq Q, Lagrange applied within QQ gives ∣Q∣=∣N∣⋅∣Q/N∣=p⋅pn−1=pn\lvert Q\rvert = \lvert N\rvert\cdot\lvert Q/N\rvert = p\cdot p^{n-1} = p^n (using Q/N≅QˉQ/N \cong \bar Q via π\pi restricted to QQ). So QQ is a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG.

Case 2: pp does not divide ∣Z(G)∣\lvert Z(G)\rvert. By the class equation, ∣G∣=∣Z(G)∣+∑i[G:CG(xi)]\lvert G\rvert = \lvert Z(G)\rvert + \sum_i[G:C_G(x_i)]. If pp divided every term [G:CG(xi)][G:C_G(x_i)], it would divide the whole sum, and since p∣∣G∣p\mid\lvert G\rvert, rearranging would force p∣∣Z(G)∣p\mid\lvert Z(G)\rvert — contradicting this case's assumption. So some noncentral xix_i has p∤[G:CG(xi)]p \nmid [G:C_G(x_i)]. Since ∣G∣=[G:CG(xi)]⋅∣CG(xi)∣\lvert G\rvert = [G:C_G(x_i)]\cdot\lvert C_G(x_i)\rvert with pn∣∣G∣p^n \mid \lvert G\rvert, and since pp is prime and shares no factor with [G:CG(xi)][G:C_G(x_i)], the entire pnp^n must sit in the other factor: pnp^n divides ∣CG(xi)∣\lvert C_G(x_i)\rvert. Since xix_i is noncentral, CG(xi)≠GC_G(x_i)\neq G, so ∣CG(xi)∣<∣G∣\lvert C_G(x_i)\rvert < \lvert G\rvert. By the induction hypothesis, CG(xi)C_G(x_i) has a subgroup of order pnp^n — a Sylow pp-subgroup of CG(xi)C_G(x_i), and therefore also a subgroup of GG of order pnp^n: a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG.

This is Cauchy's Theorem, upgraded

Compare this proof line-by-line to Theorem 8.6's proof of Cauchy's Theorem — the structure is identical, with "an element of order pp" replaced throughout by "a subgroup of order pnp^n." Sylow's First Theorem is exactly what Cauchy's Theorem becomes once the target is a full prime-power subgroup instead of a single prime-order element.


03 · Normalizers and Conjugates of a Subgroup

Definition — Normalizer

NG(H)={g∈G:gHg−1=H}N_G(H) = \{g\in G : gHg^{-1}=H\}.

Normalizers generalize normality itself

H⊴GH\trianglelefteq G exactly means NG(H)=GN_G(H)=G (every element normalizes HH). In general H≤NG(H)≤GH\le N_G(H)\le G, and H⊴NG(H)H\trianglelefteq N_G(H) always — NG(H)N_G(H) is, by construction, the largest subgroup of GG in which HH happens to sit normally.

Example — G acts on its own subgroups by conjugation

Let S\mathcal{S} be the set of all subgroups of GG, and let GG act on S\mathcal{S} by g⋅H:=gHg−1g\cdot H := gHg^{-1}. Checking A1: e⋅H=eHe−1=He\cdot H = eHe^{-1}=H. Checking A2: g⋅(h⋅H)=g(hHh−1)g−1=(gh)H(gh)−1=(gh)⋅Hg\cdot(h\cdot H) = g(hHh^{-1})g^{-1} = (gh)H(gh)^{-1} = (gh)\cdot H. Both hold — a direct extension of Chapter 08's conjugation action from elements of GG to entire subgroups of GG.

Under this action, Stab(H)={g:gHg−1=H}=NG(H)\mathrm{Stab}(H) = \{g : gHg^{-1}=H\} = N_G(H) exactly, and Orb(H)={gHg−1:g∈G}\mathrm{Orb}(H) = \{gHg^{-1}:g\in G\}, the set of conjugates of HH. By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem (Theorem 8.4):

#{conjugates of H}=[G:NG(H)]\#\{\text{conjugates of } H\} = [G:N_G(H)]

Fact — The Conjugate Count Divides m

If PP is a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG (with ∣G∣=pnm\lvert G\rvert = p^nm), then the number of conjugates of PP divides mm.

Proof

Since P≤NG(P)≤GP \le N_G(P) \le G, indices multiply along the chain (Chapter 04, Section 05): [G:P]=[G:NG(P)]⋅[NG(P):P][G:P] = [G:N_G(P)]\cdot[N_G(P):P]. The left side is [G:P]=∣G∣/∣P∣=pnm/pn=m[G:P] = \lvert G\rvert/\lvert P\rvert = p^nm/p^n = m. So [G:NG(P)][G:N_G(P)] divides mm. By the Example above, [G:NG(P)][G:N_G(P)] is exactly the number of conjugates of PP.


04 · A Key Lemma

One short lemma, proved once, powers both remaining Sylow theorems.

Lemma 9.4 — A p-Subgroup Normalizing a Sylow p-Subgroup Is Inside It

Let RR be a Sylow pp-subgroup of GG and QQ any pp-subgroup of GG with Q≤NG(R)Q\le N_G(R). Then Q≤RQ\le R.

Proof

Since Q≤NG(R)Q\le N_G(R) and R⊴NG(R)R\trianglelefteq N_G(R) (normalizers always make their subgroup normal), the Second Isomorphism Theorem (Theorem 6.6, applied inside the ambient group NG(R)N_G(R)) gives:

QR/R  ≅  Q/(Q∩R)QR/R \;\cong\; Q/(Q\cap R)

So ∣QR∣=∣R∣⋅∣Q∣∣Q∩R∣\lvert QR\rvert = \lvert R\rvert\cdot\dfrac{\lvert Q\rvert}{\lvert Q\cap R\rvert}. Both ∣Q∣\lvert Q\rvert and ∣R∣\lvert R\rvert are powers of pp (by hypothesis), so ∣QR∣\lvert QR\rvert is a power of pp as well. But QR≤GQR\le G (Theorem 6.6), so ∣QR∣\lvert QR\rvert divides ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert by Lagrange, and ∣R∣=pn\lvert R\rvert=p^n is already the largest power of pp dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert. Since ∣QR∣≥∣R∣\lvert QR\rvert \geq \lvert R\rvert (as R⊆QRR\subseteq QR) and ∣QR∣\lvert QR\rvert is a pp-power dividing ∣G∣\lvert G\rvert, we must have ∣QR∣=∣R∣=pn\lvert QR\rvert = \lvert R\rvert = p^n. Then ∣Q∣/∣Q∩R∣=∣QR∣/∣R∣=1\lvert Q\rvert/\lvert Q\cap R\rvert = \lvert QR\rvert/\lvert R\rvert = 1, so Q∩R=QQ\cap R = Q, meaning Q⊆RQ\subseteq R.


05 · Sylow's Second Theorem: Conjugacy

Theorem 9.5 — Sylow's Second Theorem (Conjugacy)

All Sylow pp-subgroups of a finite group GG are conjugate to one another. Consequently Sylp(G)\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) is exactly the set of conjugates of any single Sylow pp-subgroup.

Proof

Fix a Sylow pp-subgroup PP (which exists by Theorem 9.3), and let S={gPg−1:g∈G}S=\{gPg^{-1}:g\in G\}, the set of conjugates of PP. By the Fact in Section 03, ∣S∣=[G:NG(P)]\lvert S\rvert = [G:N_G(P)] divides mm, so p∤∣S∣p\nmid\lvert S\rvert.

Let QQ be any Sylow pp-subgroup of GG (not assumed related to PP yet). Let QQ act on SS by conjugation: q⋅(gPg−1)=q(gPg−1)q−1q\cdot(gPg^{-1}) = q(gPg^{-1})q^{-1} — this lands back in SS, since q(gPg−1)q−1=(qg)P(qg)−1q(gPg^{-1})q^{-1} = (qg)P(qg)^{-1}, still a conjugate of PP by the element qg∈Gqg\in G. By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem, every orbit of this QQ-action has size dividing ∣Q∣=pn\lvert Q\rvert=p^n, hence every orbit size is a power of pp (possibly p0=1p^0=1).

Since the orbits partition SS and ∣S∣\lvert S\rvert is not divisible by pp, not every orbit can have size divisible by pp (else their sum, ∣S∣\lvert S\rvert, would be too) — so at least one orbit has size exactly 11. That means some R=gPg−1∈SR=gPg^{-1}\in S satisfies q⋅R=Rq\cdot R = R for every q∈Qq\in Q, i.e. qRq−1=RqRq^{-1}=R for all q∈Qq\in Q, i.e. Q≤NG(R)Q\le N_G(R).

Since RR is a conjugate of the Sylow pp-subgroup PP, ∣R∣=∣P∣=pn\lvert R\rvert=\lvert P\rvert=p^n: RR is itself a Sylow pp-subgroup. Now Lemma 9.4 applies directly (QQ is a pp-subgroup with Q≤NG(R)Q\le N_G(R), RR Sylow): Q≤RQ\le R. Since ∣Q∣=∣R∣=pn\lvert Q\rvert=\lvert R\rvert=p^n (both Sylow), Q=R=gPg−1∈SQ=R=gPg^{-1}\in S.

Since QQ was an arbitrary Sylow pp-subgroup, every Sylow pp-subgroup equals some conjugate of PP: Sylp(G)=S\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) = S, and since conjugacy is transitive (composing conjugating elements), all Sylow pp-subgroups are conjugate to one another.

Example — A normal Sylow p-subgroup is unique

If GG has a normal Sylow pp-subgroup PP, its only conjugate is itself (gPg−1=PgPg^{-1}=P for every gg, by normality). By Theorem 9.5, Sylp(G)={P}\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) = \{P\} — normal Sylow pp-subgroups are always unique, and conversely a unique Sylow pp-subgroup is automatically normal (its own only conjugate, so every gg fixes it under conjugation).


06 · Sylow's Third Theorem: Counting

Theorem 9.6 — Sylow's Third Theorem (Counting)

Let ∣G∣=pnm\lvert G\rvert = p^nm with gcd⁡(p,m)=1\gcd(p,m)=1, and let np=∣Sylp(G)∣n_p = \lvert\mathrm{Syl}_p(G)\rvert. Then:

(a) np≡1(modp)n_p \equiv 1 \pmod p; (b) npn_p divides mm.

Proof

(b) By Theorem 9.5, Sylp(G)\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) is exactly the set of conjugates of a fixed Sylow pp-subgroup PP, so np=∣Sylp(G)∣n_p = \lvert\mathrm{Syl}_p(G)\rvert equals the count from the Fact in Section 03, which divides mm.

(a) Fix a Sylow pp-subgroup PP, and let PP act on Sylp(G)\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) by conjugation. By Orbit-Stabilizer, every orbit size divides ∣P∣=pn\lvert P\rvert=p^n, so every orbit size is a power of pp.

PP itself is a fixed point of this action: for h∈Ph\in P, hPh−1=PhPh^{-1}=P (conjugating PP by its own elements just permutes PP, landing back on PP as a set — this is exactly closure inside PP). So {P}\{P\} is an orbit of size 1.

Claim: it is the only size-1 orbit. Suppose R∈Sylp(G)R\in\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) is also fixed by every h∈Ph\in P, i.e. hRh−1=RhRh^{-1}=R for all h∈Ph\in P, i.e. P≤NG(R)P\le N_G(R). By Lemma 9.4 (with Q=PQ=P), P≤RP\le R; since ∣P∣=∣R∣=pn\lvert P\rvert=\lvert R\rvert=p^n, P=RP=R.

So Sylp(G)\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) splits into the single fixed orbit {P}\{P\} and other orbits, each of size a positive power of pp (hence divisible by pp, since a size-1 orbit besides {P}\{P\} is now ruled out). Counting elements:

np=1+(sum of orbit sizes each divisible by p)≡1(modp)n_p = 1 + (\text{sum of orbit sizes each divisible by } p) \equiv 1 \pmod p


07 · Application: Every Group of Order 15 Is Cyclic

Step-by-step — Classifying groups of order 15
1
Factor: 15=3×515 = 3\times5, both prime. Consider Sylow 3-subgroups and Sylow 5-subgroups.
2
Constrain n5n_5: by Theorem 9.6, n5≡1(mod5)n_5\equiv1\pmod5 and n5∣3n_5\mid3. Divisors of 3 are 1,31,3; checking mod 5: 1≡11\equiv1 ✓, 3≡33\equiv3 ✗. So n5=1n_5=1.
3
Constrain n3n_3: n3≡1(mod3)n_3\equiv1\pmod3 and n3∣5n_3\mid5. Divisors of 5 are 1,51,5; checking mod 3: 1≡11\equiv1 ✓, 5≡25\equiv2 ✗. So n3=1n_3=1.
4
Both Sylow subgroups are normal: a unique Sylow pp-subgroup is always normal (Section 05's Example). Let P5P_5 (order 5) and P3P_3 (order 3) be these unique, normal subgroups.
5
Apply the internal direct product criterion (Theorem 7.4): P5∩P3={e}P_5\cap P_3=\{e\} (Lagrange: any common element has order dividing gcd⁡(5,3)=1\gcd(5,3)=1). ∣P5P3∣=∣P5∣∣P3∣/∣P5∩P3∣=15\lvert P_5P_3\rvert = \lvert P_5\rvert\lvert P_3\rvert/\lvert P_5\cap P_3\rvert = 15 (using the Second Isomorphism Theorem's counting identity from Lemma 9.4's proof, with trivial intersection), so P5P3=GP_5P_3=G. Both conditions hold: G≅P5×P3G\cong P_5\times P_3.
6
Identify the pieces: P5≅Z5P_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_5 and P3≅Z3P_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_3 (Corollary 4.6, prime order forces cyclic). By Theorem 7.3, since gcd⁡(5,3)=1\gcd(5,3)=1: G≅Z5×Z3≅Z15G\cong\mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_3\cong\mathbb{Z}_{15}.
A full chapter's toolkit, working together

This single classification uses Lagrange's Theorem (Ch. 04), the internal direct product criterion (Ch. 07), prime-order cyclicity (Ch. 04), and both Sylow's Second and Third Theorems from this chapter — a genuine capstone showing how the entire group-theory arc assembles into results no single chapter could reach alone.


08 · Exercises

EXERCISE 9.1

Apply Theorem 9.6 exactly as in Section 07: find the divisors of m=∣G∣/pnm=\lvert G\rvert/p^n and check which are ≡1(modp)\equiv1\pmod p.

∣G∣=21=3×7\lvert G\rvert=21=3\times7. For n7n_7: divides 33, so n7∈{1,3}n_7\in\{1,3\}; need ≡1(mod7)\equiv1\pmod7: 1≡11\equiv1 ✓, 3≡33\equiv3 ✗. So n7=1n_7=1 (normal Sylow 7-subgroup, unique).

For n3n_3: divides 77, so n3∈{1,7}n_3\in\{1,7\}; need ≡1(mod3)\equiv1\pmod3: 1≡11\equiv1 ✓, 7≡17\equiv1 ✓ (since 7=2⋅3+17=2\cdot3+1). Both are consistent with Theorem 9.6 — so n3=1n_3=1 or n3=7n_3=7 is not determined by the counting theorem alone; groups of order 21 can genuinely have n3=7n_3=7 (there is a nonabelian group of order 21), unlike the order-15 case where every constraint pinned down a single value.

For ∣G∣=21\lvert G\rvert=21, use Theorem 9.6 to find the possible values of n7n_7 and n3n_3. Does the argument from Section 07 (forcing G≅Z21G\cong\mathbb{Z}_{21}) go through unchanged? Explain what's different.

EXERCISE 9.2

Apply Corollary 9.2 directly — you only need to identify the prime.

25=5225=5^2, a prime squared. By Corollary 9.2, every group of order 25 is abelian. (In fact, by the same reasoning as the order-4 case, it must be Z25\mathbb{Z}_{25} or Z5×Z5\mathbb{Z}_5\times\mathbb{Z}_5.)

Is every group of order 25 abelian? Justify using Corollary 9.2.

EXERCISE 9.3

Recall the Example in Section 05: a unique Sylow pp-subgroup is automatically normal.

If np=1n_p=1, then Sylp(G)={P}\mathrm{Syl}_p(G)=\{P\} for some Sylow pp-subgroup PP. Since Sylp(G)\mathrm{Syl}_p(G) equals the full set of conjugates of PP (Theorem 9.5), having only one conjugate means gPg−1=PgPg^{-1}=P for every g∈Gg\in G — exactly the definition of P⊴GP\trianglelefteq G.

Prove directly (using Theorem 9.5) that if np=1n_p=1, the unique Sylow pp-subgroup must be normal in GG.

EXERCISE 9.4

Factor ∣G∣=pnm\lvert G\rvert=p^nm first, then apply both parts of Theorem 9.6 to the larger prime.

∣G∣=35=5×7\lvert G\rvert=35=5\times7. For n7n_7: n7∣5n_7\mid5 so n7∈{1,5}n_7\in\{1,5\}; need ≡1(mod7)\equiv1\pmod7: 1≡11\equiv1 ✓, 5≡55\equiv5 ✗. So n7=1n_7=1, forced.

Following Section 07's exact template with P7P_7 (order 7, normal) and any Sylow 5-subgroup P5P_5: n5∣7n_5\mid7 so n5∈{1,7}n_5\in\{1,7\}; need ≡1(mod5)\equiv1\pmod5: 1≡11\equiv1✓, 7≡27\equiv2✗. So n5=1n_5=1 too. Both Sylow subgroups normal, trivial intersection (coprime orders), product has order 35=∣G∣35=\lvert G\rvert: G≅P7×P5≅Z7×Z5≅Z35G\cong P_7\times P_5 \cong \mathbb{Z}_7\times\mathbb{Z}_5\cong\mathbb{Z}_{35}.

Every group of order 35 is cyclic.

Show that every group of order 35 is cyclic, following the same template as Section 07.


09 · Chapter Summary

ConceptStatement
pp-group nontrivial center∣P∣=pn, n≥1  ⟹  Z(P)≠{e}\lvert P\rvert=p^n,\,n\geq1 \implies Z(P)\neq\{e\} (Thm 9.1)
G/Z(G)G/Z(G) cyclic   ⟹  \implies abelianLemma used to prove Corollary 9.2
Order p2p^2 groupsAlways abelian (Cor 9.2)
Sylow's First TheoremA subgroup of order pnp^n (the full pp-power) always exists (Thm 9.3)
NormalizerNG(H)={g:gHg−1=H}N_G(H)=\{g:gHg^{-1}=H\}; conjugate count =[G:NG(H)]=[G:N_G(H)]
Key LemmaQQ a pp-subgroup, Q≤NG(R)Q\le N_G(R), RR Sylow   ⟹  Q≤R\implies Q\le R (Lemma 9.4)
Sylow's Second TheoremAll Sylow pp-subgroups are conjugate (Thm 9.5)
Sylow's Third Theoremnp≡1(modp)n_p\equiv1\pmod p and np∣mn_p\mid m (Thm 9.6)
Unique Sylow subgroupnp=1  ⟺  n_p=1 \iff that Sylow pp-subgroup is normal

Next: Chapter 10 — Free Groups & Presentations steps back from analyzing a given group's internal structure to the opposite question: how to build a group from scratch out of nothing but a list of generators and relations, the way DnD_n's relations rn=e, s2=e, srs=r−1r^n=e,\,s^2=e,\,srs=r^{-1} (Chapter 02) fully determined its structure.