Sylow Theorems
00 · Symbol Glossary
A group whose order is for some prime and integer . Not to be confused with "a subgroup involving " — it specifically means the entire order is a power of a single prime.
Writing a finite group's order with the highest power of a fixed prime factored out, where . is the largest power of dividing .
The collection of all subgroups of having order exactly (the maximal -power dividing ). Each individual such subgroup is called a Sylow -subgroup.
. The central object counted by Sylow's Third Theorem — its exact value is heavily constrained by two simple arithmetic conditions.
— every element that conjugates back onto itself (as a set, not necessarily pointwise). Always contains itself, and is the largest subgroup of in which sits normally.
01 · p-Groups Have Nontrivial Centers
Sylow theory begins by understanding groups whose order is a pure prime power — the building blocks the rest of the chapter assembles inside an arbitrary finite group.
If is a group with for a prime and , then .
By the class equation (Theorem 8.5): , summing over noncentral conjugacy class representatives . Each is noncentral, so , meaning . Since divides (Lagrange) and is a divisor of a prime power greater than 1, it must itself be divisible by . So every term in the sum is divisible by , hence the whole sum is divisible by . Since also divides (as ), rearranging the class equation gives , a difference of two multiples of — so divides . Since always, ; combined with , we get .
For any group , if is cyclic, then is abelian (so in fact ).
Suppose for some . Take any ; each coset and is some power of , so and for integers and . Then:
using that commutes past , and similarly:
using that also commute with each other. So for arbitrary : is abelian. (And if is abelian, by Chapter 05's Exercise 5.4, forcing .)
If for a prime , then is abelian.
By Theorem 9.1, , so by Lagrange's Theorem, (a nontrivial divisor of ). If , then , and is abelian, done. If , then , which is cyclic by Corollary 4.6; by the Lemma above, is abelian, forcing — contradicting . So this second case cannot occur, and is the only possibility: is abelian.
Corollary 9.2 (with ) forces every group of order 4 to be abelian. Now split into cases. If some element has order 4, it generates the whole group: . Otherwise every nonidentity element has order 2 (orders divide 4 by Corollary 4.5, and order 4 is excluded), so pick two distinct nonidentity elements : then (both have order 2 and are distinct), both are normal since is abelian, and , so Theorem 7.4's internal direct product criterion gives .
Exactly two groups of order 4, up to isomorphism — and they are genuinely different, since has an element of order 4 and does not (Theorem 7.3). This confirms, with genuine theorems rather than case-checking by hand, the classification hinted at throughout Chapters 05 and 07.
02 · Sylow's First Theorem: Existence
Let with prime and . A subgroup with is called a Sylow -subgroup of .
For any finite group and any prime dividing , has a Sylow -subgroup — that is, a subgroup of order , the full power of dividing .
By strong induction on . Write , . If , the trivial subgroup works.
Case 1: divides . By Cauchy's Theorem (Theorem 8.6), has an element of order . Let ; since , every satisfies (elements of commute with everything, so conjugation fixes them individually), so . Then , strictly smaller than . By the induction hypothesis, has a subgroup of order . Let be the preimage of under the quotient map (a subgroup of , since preimages of subgroups under homomorphisms are subgroups — the same style of check as Theorem 6.2's proof). Since , Lagrange applied within gives (using via restricted to ). So is a Sylow -subgroup of .
Case 2: does not divide . By the class equation, . If divided every term , it would divide the whole sum, and since , rearranging would force — contradicting this case's assumption. So some noncentral has . Since with , and since is prime and shares no factor with , the entire must sit in the other factor: divides . Since is noncentral, , so . By the induction hypothesis, has a subgroup of order — a Sylow -subgroup of , and therefore also a subgroup of of order : a Sylow -subgroup of .
Compare this proof line-by-line to Theorem 8.6's proof of Cauchy's Theorem — the structure is identical, with "an element of order " replaced throughout by "a subgroup of order ." Sylow's First Theorem is exactly what Cauchy's Theorem becomes once the target is a full prime-power subgroup instead of a single prime-order element.
03 · Normalizers and Conjugates of a Subgroup
.
exactly means (every element normalizes ). In general , and always — is, by construction, the largest subgroup of in which happens to sit normally.
Let be the set of all subgroups of , and let act on by . Checking A1: . Checking A2: . Both hold — a direct extension of Chapter 08's conjugation action from elements of to entire subgroups of .
Under this action, exactly, and , the set of conjugates of . By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem (Theorem 8.4):
If is a Sylow -subgroup of (with ), then the number of conjugates of divides .
Since , indices multiply along the chain (Chapter 04, Section 05): . The left side is . So divides . By the Example above, is exactly the number of conjugates of .
04 · A Key Lemma
One short lemma, proved once, powers both remaining Sylow theorems.
Let be a Sylow -subgroup of and any -subgroup of with . Then .
Since and (normalizers always make their subgroup normal), the Second Isomorphism Theorem (Theorem 6.6, applied inside the ambient group ) gives:
So . Both and are powers of (by hypothesis), so is a power of as well. But (Theorem 6.6), so divides by Lagrange, and is already the largest power of dividing . Since (as ) and is a -power dividing , we must have . Then , so , meaning .
05 · Sylow's Second Theorem: Conjugacy
All Sylow -subgroups of a finite group are conjugate to one another. Consequently is exactly the set of conjugates of any single Sylow -subgroup.
Fix a Sylow -subgroup (which exists by Theorem 9.3), and let , the set of conjugates of . By the Fact in Section 03, divides , so .
Let be any Sylow -subgroup of (not assumed related to yet). Let act on by conjugation: — this lands back in , since , still a conjugate of by the element . By the Orbit-Stabilizer Theorem, every orbit of this -action has size dividing , hence every orbit size is a power of (possibly ).
Since the orbits partition and is not divisible by , not every orbit can have size divisible by (else their sum, , would be too) — so at least one orbit has size exactly . That means some satisfies for every , i.e. for all , i.e. .
Since is a conjugate of the Sylow -subgroup , : is itself a Sylow -subgroup. Now Lemma 9.4 applies directly ( is a -subgroup with , Sylow): . Since (both Sylow), .
Since was an arbitrary Sylow -subgroup, every Sylow -subgroup equals some conjugate of : , and since conjugacy is transitive (composing conjugating elements), all Sylow -subgroups are conjugate to one another.
If has a normal Sylow -subgroup , its only conjugate is itself ( for every , by normality). By Theorem 9.5, — normal Sylow -subgroups are always unique, and conversely a unique Sylow -subgroup is automatically normal (its own only conjugate, so every fixes it under conjugation).
06 · Sylow's Third Theorem: Counting
Let with , and let . Then:
(a) ; (b) divides .
(b) By Theorem 9.5, is exactly the set of conjugates of a fixed Sylow -subgroup , so equals the count from the Fact in Section 03, which divides .
(a) Fix a Sylow -subgroup , and let act on by conjugation. By Orbit-Stabilizer, every orbit size divides , so every orbit size is a power of .
itself is a fixed point of this action: for , (conjugating by its own elements just permutes , landing back on as a set — this is exactly closure inside ). So is an orbit of size 1.
Claim: it is the only size-1 orbit. Suppose is also fixed by every , i.e. for all , i.e. . By Lemma 9.4 (with ), ; since , .
So splits into the single fixed orbit and other orbits, each of size a positive power of (hence divisible by , since a size-1 orbit besides is now ruled out). Counting elements:
07 · Application: Every Group of Order 15 Is Cyclic
This single classification uses Lagrange's Theorem (Ch. 04), the internal direct product criterion (Ch. 07), prime-order cyclicity (Ch. 04), and both Sylow's Second and Third Theorems from this chapter — a genuine capstone showing how the entire group-theory arc assembles into results no single chapter could reach alone.
08 · Exercises
Apply Theorem 9.6 exactly as in Section 07: find the divisors of and check which are .
. For : divides , so ; need : ✓, ✗. So (normal Sylow 7-subgroup, unique).
For : divides , so ; need : ✓, ✓ (since ). Both are consistent with Theorem 9.6 — so or is not determined by the counting theorem alone; groups of order 21 can genuinely have (there is a nonabelian group of order 21), unlike the order-15 case where every constraint pinned down a single value.
For , use Theorem 9.6 to find the possible values of and . Does the argument from Section 07 (forcing ) go through unchanged? Explain what's different.
Apply Corollary 9.2 directly — you only need to identify the prime.
, a prime squared. By Corollary 9.2, every group of order 25 is abelian. (In fact, by the same reasoning as the order-4 case, it must be or .)
Is every group of order 25 abelian? Justify using Corollary 9.2.
Recall the Example in Section 05: a unique Sylow -subgroup is automatically normal.
If , then for some Sylow -subgroup . Since equals the full set of conjugates of (Theorem 9.5), having only one conjugate means for every — exactly the definition of .
Prove directly (using Theorem 9.5) that if , the unique Sylow -subgroup must be normal in .
Factor first, then apply both parts of Theorem 9.6 to the larger prime.
. For : so ; need : ✓, ✗. So , forced.
Following Section 07's exact template with (order 7, normal) and any Sylow 5-subgroup : so ; need : ✓, ✗. So too. Both Sylow subgroups normal, trivial intersection (coprime orders), product has order : .
Every group of order 35 is cyclic.
Show that every group of order 35 is cyclic, following the same template as Section 07.
09 · Chapter Summary
| Concept | Statement |
|---|---|
| -group nontrivial center | (Thm 9.1) |
| cyclic abelian | Lemma used to prove Corollary 9.2 |
| Order groups | Always abelian (Cor 9.2) |
| Sylow's First Theorem | A subgroup of order (the full -power) always exists (Thm 9.3) |
| Normalizer | ; conjugate count |
| Key Lemma | a -subgroup, , Sylow (Lemma 9.4) |
| Sylow's Second Theorem | All Sylow -subgroups are conjugate (Thm 9.5) |
| Sylow's Third Theorem | and (Thm 9.6) |
| Unique Sylow subgroup | that Sylow -subgroup is normal |
Next: Chapter 10 — Free Groups & Presentations steps back from analyzing a given group's internal structure to the opposite question: how to build a group from scratch out of nothing but a list of generators and relations, the way 's relations (Chapter 02) fully determined its structure.