Splitting Fields & Algebraic Closures
00 · Symbol Glossary
The smallest extension of in which factors completely into linear pieces. This chapter's central construction.
An algebraic extension of in which every polynomial splits completely — the "largest algebraic extension," in a precise sense, and unique up to isomorphism.
For , — defined by the power-rule formula alone, with no limits, so it makes sense over any field, including finite ones.
A complex number with , : concretely . Appears constantly in splitting fields of cubics.
01 · Splitting Fields
Let . A field is a splitting field of over if: (a) factors into linear factors in ; (b) , where are the roots of in (no smaller field works).
over , and both roots generate exactly . is the splitting field of over .
02 · Existence of Splitting Fields
For every field and every with , a splitting field of over exists.
By strong induction on . If already factors into linear pieces over , then (generated over itself by the roots, which already lie in ) is a splitting field.
Otherwise, has an irreducible factor of degree . By Theorem 18.4, is a field extension of containing a root of (hence of , since ). In , the Factor Theorem gives for some with .
By the induction hypothesis (applied to over the field ), has a splitting field over : factors into linear pieces over , and where are 's roots. Then also factors into linear pieces over , and — exactly adjoined with all of 's roots. So is a splitting field of over .
03 · Uniqueness of Splitting Fields
Existence alone would be unsatisfying if different constructions gave genuinely different fields. They don't — up to relabeling.
Let be a field isomorphism, extend it to by applying to each coefficient (a ring isomorphism, since preserves coefficientwise), and let . If is a splitting field of over and is a splitting field of over , then extends to an isomorphism .
By induction on . If , , so already splits over ; applying termwise to the linear factorization shows splits over too, so (generated by roots already present) and itself is the required isomorphism.
Otherwise pick a root of with , and let (an irreducible factor of over , by Theorem 18.2). Applying to 's coefficients gives an irreducible factor of over (irreducibility is preserved: any nontrivial factorization would pull back via to a nontrivial factorization of , contradiction). Since splits completely, has a root .
By Theorem 18.4 applied on both sides, and ; since identifies with (it's an isomorphism sending the ideal to ), composing gives an isomorphism extending , with .
Now is a splitting field of over the larger base field (same field , same roots, just a bigger base), and is a splitting field of over . Since (as , Theorem 18.4), the induction hypothesis applies to in place of : (hence ) extends to an isomorphism .
Any two splitting fields of over are isomorphic via a map fixing pointwise.
Apply Theorem 19.2 with , .
Corollary 19.3 licenses the phrase "the splitting field of ," treated as a single well-defined object up to relabeling — exactly the setting Chapter 20 needs to define the Galois group of as "the automorphisms of the splitting field fixing ," without ambiguity about which splitting field was chosen.
04 · Algebraic Closures
A field is algebraically closed if every nonconstant has a root in (equivalently, splits completely into linear factors over ). An algebraic closure of , written , is an algebraic extension of that is algebraically closed.
Every field has an algebraic closure, unique up to isomorphism — a genuine theorem, but its general proof requires Zorn's Lemma (to handle possibly infinite towers of extensions) rather than the finite inductive techniques of this chapter. We take existence and uniqueness as given, the same deferral used for free-group associativity (Chapter 10) and the field of fractions (Chapter 17): the construction is real, but its technical machinery is a detour from this course's algebraic focus.
The Fundamental Theorem of Algebra (an analysis result, proved via complex analysis or topology rather than pure algebra, and not reproved here) states every nonconstant polynomial in has a root in . So is algebraically closed, and since is algebraic ( is finite, so Theorem 18.5 applies), .
(the algebraic numbers: all complex numbers that are roots of some polynomial in ) is a proper subfield of — it's countable (each polynomial has finitely many roots, and there are only countably many polynomials with rational coefficients), while is uncountable. So , even though both are algebraically closed: algebraic closures are only unique relative to the base field, not universally.
05 · Multiple Roots and Separability
For , define (where means , times — makes sense in any field, no limits needed). The product rule holds by direct expansion, exactly as in calculus.
Let be a splitting field of and a root of . Then is a multiple root (i.e. in ) if and only if .
By the Factor Theorem, for some . By the product rule, . Evaluating at : .
(Factor Theorem again) .
is separable if it has no multiple roots in its splitting field.
Suppose has characteristic and is irreducible with . Its leading term has derivative , and in (since means no positive integer multiple of a nonzero element vanishes). So and . Any common root of and would make (computable via the Euclidean algorithm in , Chapter 15) a nonconstant common divisor — but is irreducible, so its only divisors are units and associates of itself; since , cannot be an associate of , forcing to be a unit (constant), meaning no shared root exists. By Theorem 19.4, has no multiple roots: every irreducible polynomial over a characteristic-0 field is separable.
Chapters 20–21 work with extensions of (characteristic 0) throughout, so separability is automatic there by the Example above — every irreducible polynomial behaves as "nicely" as possible, with no repeated roots to complicate the Galois correspondence. (Characteristic- fields can have genuinely inseparable irreducible polynomials, but that phenomenon is outside this course's scope.)
06 · A Worked Splitting Field
07 · Exercises
Find all roots of in first, then determine the smallest field over containing all of them.
Roots of : . The smallest field over containing all four is (since already, and once is adjoined). splits completely over .
The splitting field of over is , with degree 2.
Find the splitting field of over , and its degree.
Apply Theorem 19.4: compute and check for a common root with .
, . Check : ✓; ✓. By Theorem 19.4, is a multiple root. (Confirmed: .)
Using Theorem 19.4, determine whether is a multiple root of .
Recall that has characteristic 0, and apply the Example from Section 05.
has characteristic 0. By the Example in Section 05, every irreducible polynomial over is automatically separable — including (irreducible, Section 04's earlier chapters) with no need to check by hand.
Is separable over ? Justify using the characteristic-0 fact from Section 05, without computing a gcd directly.
08 · Chapter Summary
| Concept | Statement |
|---|---|
| Splitting field | Smallest extension where factors into linear pieces |
| Existence | Every has a splitting field (Thm 19.1) |
| Isomorphism Extension Theorem | Field isomorphisms extend across matching splitting fields (Thm 19.2) |
| Uniqueness | Splitting fields of over are unique up to -isomorphism (Cor 19.3) |
| Algebraic closure | Algebraic + algebraically closed; exists, unique up to isomorphism |
| Fundamental Theorem of Algebra | |
| Formal derivative | ; product rule holds in any field |
| Multiple root test | multiple root (Thm 19.4) |
| Separable | No multiple roots; automatic for irreducibles in characteristic 0 |
Next: Chapter 20 — Galois Theory: Fundamentals defines the Galois group of a splitting field and proves the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory, translating field-theoretic questions about a polynomial into purely group-theoretic ones.