$f(W_t,t)$a smooth function of Brownian motion and time
Assumed C2 in the spatial argument and C1 in time — enough derivatives to Taylor-expand, which is all Itô's Lemma is: a Taylor expansion kept honest about quadratic variation.
$[X]_t$quadratic variation of $X$
From Chapter 03: for Brownian motion, [W]t=t; informally (dWt)2=dt. This replacement is the entire mechanical content of Itô's Lemma.
$dX_t = \mu_t\,dt + \sigma_t\,dW_t$a general Itô process
Shorthand for Xt=X0+∫0tμsds+∫0tσsdWs, the object Chapter 05 built. μt is the drift, σt the diffusion coefficient.
$f_x,\,f_{xx},\,f_t$partial derivatives of $f$
Standard subscript notation: fx=∂f/∂x, fxx=∂2f/∂x2, ft=∂f/∂t. Itô's Lemma is a formula for df in terms of exactly these.
01 · Taylor's Theorem, Kept Honest
Ordinary calculus differentiates f(xt) by a first-order Taylor expansion: df=f′(xt)dxt, with second-order terms discarded because (dxt)2 is negligible compared to dxt when xt is smooth. Chapter 03 showed that is false for Brownian motion — (ΔW)2 is the same order as Δt, not smaller. Itô's Lemma is the second-order Taylor expansion with that fact kept instead of discarded.
Start from a second-order expansion of f(Wt+Δt)−f(Wt) over a small step:
Δf≈f′(Wt)ΔW+21f′′(Wt)(ΔW)2+O((ΔW)3)
In ordinary calculus, (ΔW)2 would be O(Δt2) and vanish faster than Δt as the partition is refined. For Brownian motion, E[(ΔW)2]=Δt, and Chapter 03's quadratic-variation result says ∑(ΔW)2→t — the sum of squared increments does not vanish, it converges to a finite, nonzero limit. The correct replacement, justified by that convergence, is (dWt)2=dt inside any expression that is eventually integrated.
The one rule to memorize
(dWt)2=dt, dWtdt=0, (dt)2=0. Every version of Itô's Lemma below is Taylor's theorem plus this substitution rule, nothing more.
Plain language: the ordinary chain-rule term fxdWt is still there, but there is an extra drift term 21fxxdt that has no analogue in deterministic calculus. It appears because the second-order Taylor term 21fxx(dWt)2 does not vanish — it becomes 21fxxdt, a bona fide first-order contribution to the drift.
Example — $d(W_t^2)$
Let f(x)=x2, so fx=2x, fxx=2. Itô's Lemma gives
d(Wt2)=2WtdWt+21(2)dt=2WtdWt+dt
Integrating: WT2=∫0T2WtdWt+T, i.e. ∫0TWtdWt=21WT2−21T — exactly the identity flagged in Chapter 05's FailBlock, now derived rather than asserted.
03 · General Diffusions
The pure-Brownian case extends immediately once Wt is replaced by a general Itô process Xt.
Definition — Itô's Lemma, General Case
Let dXt=μtdt+σtdWt and let f(x,t) be C2 in x, C1 in t. Then
df(Xt,t)=(ft+μtfx+21σt2fxx)dt+σtfxdWt
Plain language: fx carries through both the drift μt and the noise σtdWt exactly as the ordinary chain rule would predict, but there is again a correction 21σt2fxxdt coming from (dXt)2=σt2dt — the increment squared inherits its quadratic variation entirely from the diffusion coefficient, not the drift, because dt and dWtdt terms vanish under squaring while (σtdWt)2=σt2dt survives. This is the formula that will turn the SDE for a stock price (Chapter 08) into a solvable equation for logSt.
Step-by-step — Applying Itô's Lemma
1
Identify Xt's drift and diffusion: write dXt=μtdt+σtdWt explicitly; misreading either coefficient propagates into every term below.
2
Compute ft, fx, fxx: ordinary partial derivatives of the transform f, evaluated at (Xt,t).
3
Assemble the drift:ft+μtfx+21σt2fxx — three separate contributions, and it is easy to forget the third.
4
Assemble the diffusion term:σtfxdWt — this one matches ordinary chain-rule intuition exactly.
04 · Worked Examples
Example — $d(e^{W_t})$
f(x)=ex, so fx=fxx=ex. With μt=0,σt=1 (pure Wt),
d(eWt)=21eWtdt+eWtdWt
Notice the drift is strictly positive: eWt has an upward bias even though Wt itself has zero drift. This is not a modeling choice — it falls straight out of fxx>0 (convexity of the exponential) and is the mechanism behind the lognormal mean correction that Chapter 08 needs for geometric Brownian motion.
Example — $d(W_t^3)$ as a check of the pattern
f(x)=x3, fx=3x2, fxx=6x. Then d(Wt3)=3Wt2dWt+3Wtdt. Unlike the two previous examples, the correction term here is itself random (3Wtdt, not a constant), because fxx=6x depends on x. Constant fxx is the special case that produces a deterministic correction; it is not the general rule.
❌ Applying the chain rule without the second-order term
A common shortcut: "f(Wt) changes by f′(Wt)dWt, same as ordinary calculus" — and then d(eWt)=eWtdWt is reported with no drift.
Why it breaks: it drops the 21fxxdt term entirely, treating (dWt)2 as negligible the way ordinary calculus treats (dx)2. Section 01 is precisely the argument for why that is wrong for Brownian motion.
Consequence: the resulting process has the wrong mean. E[eWt] under the correct formula grows like et/2 (matching the lognormal moment-generating function directly), while the shortcut formula implies a driftless martingale with constant mean E[eW0]=1 — flatly wrong for t>0.
05 · Exercises
EXERCISE 6.1
Apply the general formula with μt,σt constant and f(x,t)=g(x) time-independent.
df(Xt)=(μg′(Xt)+21σ2g′′(Xt))dt+σg′(Xt)dWt. Setting g(x)=x2: d(Xt2)=(2μXt+σ2)dt+2σXtdWt. The σ2dt term is the quadratic-variation correction; it survives even though g′′=2 is constant, because σt2=0.
For dXt=μdt+σdWt (constant μ,σ), compute d(Xt2) using the general Itô's Lemma.
EXERCISE 6.2
f(x)=logx has fx=1/x, fxx=−1/x2; apply with Xt=St following dSt=μStdt+σStdWt.
d(logSt)=(μ−21σ2)dt+σdWt. The correction −21σ2dt is negative here because fxx=−1/St2<0 (log is concave) — the opposite sign from the eWt example in Section 04, where convexity gave a positive correction. This identity is exactly the tool Chapter 08 uses to solve geometric Brownian motion.
Let St follow dSt=μStdt+σStdWt. Compute d(logSt) and explain the sign of the correction term.
EXERCISE 6.3
Compare d(eWt) (Section 04) to d(eσWt−σ2t/2); the second is built to cancel its own correction term.
Let Yt=eσWt−σ2t/2. With f(x,t)=eσx−σ2t/2: ft=−2σ2f, fx=σf, fxx=σ2f. So dYt=(−2σ2+21σ2)fdt+σfdWt=σYtdWt — the drift cancels exactly, leaving a pure martingale. This is the stochastic exponential, and its driftless property is the seed of Girsanov's Theorem (Chapter 10).
Show that Yt=eσWt−σ2t/2 has zero drift under Itô's Lemma. Why is this remarkable given that eWt alone (Section 04) has strictly positive drift?
06 · Chapter Summary
Concept
Meaning
Core substitution
(dWt)2=dt, dWtdt=0, (dt)2=0
Pure Brownian case
df=ftdt+fxdWt+21fxxdt
General diffusion
df=(ft+μfx+21σ2fxx)dt+σfxdWt
Correction source
second-order Taylor term, kept instead of discarded
d(logSt)
drift shifts by −21σ2 relative to naive log
Common error
dropping 21fxxdt, producing the wrong mean
Next: Chapter 07 — Stochastic Differential Equations, where Itô's Lemma becomes the tool for turning an equation for dXt into a closed-form solution for Xt.